|
|
|
|
|
|
HomeCookwareCookware SetsCuisinart 722-30HNS Chef's Classic Nonstick Stainless 12-Inch Open Skillet with Helper Handle |
|
|  | | | Customer Reviews: | | | Average Customer Review: ( 54 customer reviews )
Write an online review and share your thoughts with other customers.
Most Helpful Customer Reviews
16 of 16 found the following review helpful:
 Good bang for the buck Dec 15, 2006
By Roger Sadowsky
This non-stick skillet was top rated by Cooks Illustrated Magazine and I concur with their opinion.
A great pan for the money, even if you have to replace it every year or two.
Roger
13 of 13 found the following review helpful:
Can't beat it for the price Jan 26, 2008
By Amozarte
The majority of my pots and pans are from the same Cuisinart line and while I wouldn't put them up against fancier (and more expensive) pans like All-Clad, I've certainly been more than satisfied with the Cuisinart's performance.
I've owned the stainless set for well over a year and they've held up quite well. No warping, no serious scratches, no complaints. I bought this non-stick a few weeks ago because I've been so happy with the performance of the stainless pans of the same line.
Let's face it, you're going to have to replace your non-stick pan every year or two no matter what. So why pay a hundred dollars or more for one??
This skillet is in the price range of the "dime a dozen" skillets you'd find at your local kitchen supply store. However, it looks much nicer, heats evenly and does a great job overall.
No matter what the box says, that $100+ non-stick pan you're considering isn't going to last any longer than this one and you really have to ask yourself if that $100+ pan is truly worth the price difference.
Do yourself a favour and give this skillet a shot. You won't be disappointed.
15 of 16 found the following review helpful:
 Nonstick finish not in it for the long haul Aug 11, 2008
By SaladQueen
Have owned this pan for about five years, and really liked it at first. I'd hoped it would last a very long time, given the new-formula, supposedly sturdy, nonstick finish, as well as its strong stainless steel clad construction. But the nonstick surface has been progressively peeling off around the rivets for the past couple of years, not anywhere we use utensils. It's just plain surface failure, and we don't want it in our food. The degradation of the nonstick surface is all the more disappointing because this pan seems otherwise to have everything else going for it.
7 of 7 found the following review helpful:
Great product Jun 08, 2006
By Carol Nelson
I bought this skillet as a reasonably-priced non-stick alternative to my 12" All-Clad. We have ended up using this pan more than any other.
This pan is terrific. It is very well made, has a good solid feel with just a bit of heft to it.
I would highly recommend this pan.
7 of 7 found the following review helpful:
Greatest non-stick pan ever Oct 09, 2007
By real review
I have used this pan now for almost a year and it has been nothing short of fantastic. I purchased this pan because I needed something a little bit smaller than my 12" non-stick pan and I found that an 8" pan was too small, this one fit the bill perfectly. I have actually tried to get cheese and egg to stick to this pan just because I could hardly believe how well it has performed and I have to say that the pan wins every time. Cleaning it is a breeze and the non-stick surface still looks nearly new with only a couple small surface scratches that you can see in just the right light, but are not deep enough to feel with your fingernail (yes, I have used metal utensils in it). I purchased this pan locally as a factory second (it had a small dent in the rim), but consider it to be one of my best kitchen buys to date.
See all 54 customer reviews on Amazon.com
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
